Welcome! Subscribe Here

Your email:

Courion Corporation

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Privileged User Access Assurance

 

Adam Bosnian recently noted in an article he penned in SC Magazine the importance of privileged user access and the risk of poor controls around privileged users.  We clearly see this as a critical issue that our customers and prospective customers are trying to get their hands around, and it's critical that privileged accounts are considered as part of a broader access assurance strategy.

Access assurance, for those not familiar with the term, is ensuring that the right users have the right access to the right resources, and are doing the right things with it.  One of the most popular questions I get when I'm on the road talking to companies is, "Where should we start?"  We often find organizations taking a tactical jump into access assurance.  Often it's driven by an audit finding.  So, if it's a SOX audit, it's the key financial apps they start with.  If HIPAA it may be clinical applications.  If it's a finding around accounts still in place for users that left the organization, it's a focus on disabling user access.

Organization need to take a step back and prepare a comprehensive access assurance strategy.  The key is to look across the environment and build a phased plan with some key initial wins.  This should be driven by the highest areas of the risk in the organization.  You should try to avoid the fire fighting approach trying to stomp out little fires all over the place.  Build a plan and make sure to include privileged user access as part of the broader identity and access management program.

It's important to take this comprehensive view to lay out a continual process for access assurance.  Define who should have access to what.  Enforce and apply that access.  Detect when access or activity is beyond the scope of policy.  Correct variances from policy and coutinously evaluate if the policy is appropriate.  This applies to privileged and common users alike.

Comments

"Access assurance"? What's wrong with the - much better known, I think - "risk management?" It's really an analog, not a digital, function. 
 
-dave
Posted @ Tuesday, April 07, 2009 1:21 PM by Dave Kearns
Nothing's wrong with risk management. But, risk management is a broad area that covers many different elements of risk. What I'm trying to do is focus on the specific component of access. Within access assurance, risk management is a key component, but it also hits the aspects of access governance, enforcement (access provisioning), and validation. Risk management is a critical aspect of this, but access assurance is meant to be much more of a lifecycle.
Posted @ Tuesday, April 07, 2009 5:15 PM by Kurt Johnson
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics